Freephone 1800 200 233

Tuesday, 05 July 2016 11:38

Andrew Doyle encourages further forestry

Minister Andrew Doyle actively encourages new afforestation across Ireland.

Published in Green Belt Blog
Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34

Forests to Fight Climate Change

Forestry has a critical role to play in fighting climate change Read More

In an article from the Farmers Journal, A study launched at the Paris climate conference recommends clear European policy decisions to grow our forests into greater carbon sinks.

The negotiations under way in Paris include how countries will be allowed to account for activities that take greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere, including forestry.

A study presented by the European Forest Institute on the side of the COP21 climate conference and funded by European governments including Ireland recommends that the EU assign clear targets to each member state in this area.

The experts estimate that forests and the forest sector currently offset 13% of the EU’s overall greenhouse gas emissions, and a lot more could be done if they were developed and managed more efficiently.

“If adequately incentivised, member states could achieve a combined additional effect of as much as 400 Mt CO2/year by 2030 on top of the existing sink and substitution. With the existing sink and substitution this comes to an equivalent of about 22% of the current EU CO2 emissions,” the authors of the report wrote.

This is of particular interest to Ireland, where the forest cover is very low and the Government has already been providing incentives for afforestation in recent years.

“Ireland has a lot of young, new plantations. One measure for Ireland could be to further expand your forest area, but also find synergies with maybe more variation of forestry sources,” Geert Jan Nabuurs of Wageningen University told the Irish Farmers Journal. “If you only have plantations on drained peatlands, your carbon benefits may not be that large,” the lead author of the study added.

Listen to an interview with Geert Jan Nabuurs in our podcast below:

The European Forest Institute recommends a policy that encourages “climate-smart forestry”, which looks for the most cost-efficient climate benefits based on each country’s characteristics and circumstances.

In Ireland, the Department of Agriculture has signalled that it was planning incentives to convert the least efficient pastures for livestock grazing to forestry.

Yet the rest of the agriculture and land use sector should not expect a free ride from the development of forestry. The EU will decide next year whether emissions from agriculture and gains from trees should be accounted for in the same basket. Regardless of the final outcome, all observers in Paris reckon that every sector will be asked to make a significant contribution to emissions cuts, regardless of offsets found elsewhere.

Read more

Full coverage: agriculture and climate change

Published in Green Belt Blog
Thursday, 12 November 2015 11:04

Farmers must act on 'off kilter' emissions

Tom Arnold believes more forestry required if ag sector wants to maintain national cattle herd. Read More
Adam Cullen, Farming Independent. Published 11/11/2015

Farmers have been warned to stop 'codding' themselves into thinking that their lower-than-average greenhouse gas emissions will save them from any limits on expansion in the future.

By 2020, the EPA environmental watchdog has estimated that industries, including agriculture, will be releasing 6-11pc more carbon than allowed under the national emissions ceilings.

Based on current trends, farming will be responsible for 45pc of those emissions in Ireland, with transport the next most important sector.

"Somebody is going to pay for this, and it's time for us to be honest," said Tom Arnold, the former Concern chief executive-turned-boss of the Institute of International and European Affairs. "Agriculture is not going to get a freepass on this, even if Irish producers are among the most carbon efficient in the world. TOM ARNOLD

"There may have to be a trade-off between the size of the national herd and the forestry sector in the medium to long-term future to allow Ireland to become more sustainable," said Mr Arnold, who addressed the ICOS sustainability conference in Dublin.

"Obviously trees consume carbon and cows emit it. At the moment, the balance between the two is off kilter." The warning comes as Bord Bia yesterday launched new 'green' targets for the country's multi-billion euro agriculture industry.

Bord Bia claimed Ireland's beef industry could become the most carbon efficient in Europe, while generating an additional €300m on-farm income a year. The analysis claims greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture could be slashed by 6pc, or a million tonnes of carbon if sustainability measures on the lower-performing beef and dairy farms reached the national average.

Currently Ireland's dairy herd has the joint-lowest carbon footprint in the EU, while the beef herd is ranked at number five.

Global Discussions have been intensifying ahead of world leaders meeting in Paris next month to strike a global deal on curbing emissions over the coming decades.

Mr Arnold said that the industry needed to start analysing the numbers behind the latest growth plan in Food Wise 2025 for the food sector.

"We are not going to be able to cod ourselves on this," he added. He also stressed the importance of delivering higher genetic merit animals to reduce emissions.

"That should be the priority before adding to numbers. We can make great strides through better breeding programmes and that has to be a priority," he said.

Eddie Punch, the ICSA general secretary, said there was a compelling case to maximise production of beef and dairy in Ireland as it is a sustainable grass-based system.

Mr Punch said that grass also sequesters carbon but it was often "ignored" in the debate. Both Harold Kingston, the IFA's environment spokesman, and the ICMSA's John Comer argued that simply reducing emissions to cut production would be counter productive as it would be produced in less efficient areas.

Mr Arnold warned that the environmental issues go beyond the farm gate, and processors and retailers also have a role to play. He added that incentives would have to be put in place to ensure farmers invest in biomass crops such as forestry.

Former ESRI Economist John Fitzgerald said the odds are "stacked against farmers" who want to grow biomass crops.

Mr Fitzgerald said there was "no simplistic" answer but a system was needed that benefitted both farmers and the environment.

"We need more biomass carbon-consuming production. Do we need to reduce our cattle numbers for that? It is much too early to tell. We need more research," he said.

Indo Farming

Published in Green Belt Blog

Quick Contact

Fields marked with * are required

NewsLetter Signup